Posted On: August 28, 2008

Fremont Bankruptcy Attorney Talks about Reaffirmations

Fremont Bankruptcy Attorney Talks about Reaffirmations

There is a common misconception in bankruptcy. Many people believe that if they file bankruptcy, they will have to lose all their assets including cars. Of course, without a car, the debtors (as they are called by the Bankruptcy court) will probably lose their jobs and fall into the more debt. This problem has been well anticipated by the lawmakers, the Bankruptcy Court, and even the creditors. For more information on bankruptcy FAQ's and understanding your bankruptcy rights, please visit Sagaria Law.

The lawmakers created a procedure called “reaffirmation” of debts or an order by the Bankruptcy court stating that a certain debt will survive the bankruptcy and remain in effect. A common reaffirmation is where the Bankruptcy court reaffirms a car debt so that the debtors can keep a car by continuing payment on it.

In order to get such a reaffirmation, the debtor and creditor both must sign a contract stating that the exact terms of the reaffirmation including total amount reaffirmed, monthly payments, and interest rate. The Bankruptcy court is very worried about debtors getting in over their heads again so the agreement has at least three areas for the debtors to sign that they want this reaffirmation.

Furthermore, the Bankruptcy court requires the debtor to state if the monthly payments will be a “hardship” or not. A hardship is found if the debtors living expenses will exceed their income before they account for the new monthly payments. The debtors have to give a statement as to how they will pay the additional monthly amount if they have such a hardship. This is not an easy thing to prove and the Bankruptcy court is likely to deny a reaffirmation if the debtors cannot give a good explanation how they will overcome the reaffirmation.

Fortunately for the debtors, creditors really want reaffirmations of debts and may be very accommodating in order to get one. For example, a creditor which had previously refused to alter the terms of a car loan may decide to lower the loan amount, the interest rate, and/or monthly payments in a bankruptcy because they want to encourage the debtor and Bankruptcy court to accept. The reason for the sudden willingness to accommodate is because the creditor’s other choice is to take a car in an unknown condition that they will have to sell. The creditors would rather get the debtor’s money. If the creditor asks for too much money, then the Bankruptcy Court will deny the reaffirmation. Therefore a reaffirmation can be a silver lining in a bankruptcy for the debtor.

If you have questions about asset protection please contact Sagaria Law for an experienced bankruptcy attorney to answer your questions. If you are considering bankruptcy or reaffirming a debt, please consider scheduling a free consultation with Sagaria Law 1-800-941-6730.

Posted On: August 20, 2008

San Jose Bankruptcy Attorney Discusses Maiden Mills Wants To Convert Bankruptcy Filing From Chapter 11 To Chapter 7

San Jose Bankruptcy Attorney Discusses Maiden Mills Wants To Convert Bankruptcy Filing From Chapter 11 To Chapter 7

Maiden Mills Industries Inc., the maker of Polartec fleece, says that it wants to convert from Chapter 11 bankruptcy to a Chapter 7 case. This announcement comes after the textile maker’s lender, General Electric Capital Corp., and the committee of unsecured creditors failed to work out a liquidation plan under Chapter 11.

In its petition to the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Worcester, Massachusetts, Maiden Mills said the conversion would make the winding process easier for the company. A hearing is set for March 15.

Chapter 11 cases are allowed to convert to Chapter 7 as long as the debtor is still in possession. Debtors who were involuntarily forced to declare bankruptcy are not allowed to convert their bankruptcy cases.

Last month, the textile maker won court approval to sell its assets to Chrysalis Capital Partners, a private equity firm, for $44 million. Chrysalis will run the mill under the name Polartec LLC. Proceeds from the sale will be used to settle remaining costs from the Chapter 11 case and fund the conversion, the Company said.

Maiden Mills had filed for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy on January 10.

Continue reading " San Jose Bankruptcy Attorney Discusses Maiden Mills Wants To Convert Bankruptcy Filing From Chapter 11 To Chapter 7 " »

Posted On: August 12, 2008

Fremont Bankruptcy Attorney Discusses Three Banks and a Venture Capital Company Push Music Entrepreneur Lou Pearlman Toward Personal Bankruptcy

Fremont Bankruptcy Attorney Discusses Three Banks and a Venture Capital Company Push Music Entrepreneur Lou Pearlman Toward Personal Bankruptcy

In Central Florida, an involuntary petition for personal bankruptcy against music entrepreneur Lou Pearlman was filed by American Bank of St. Paul, Minnesota, First National Bank of Trust of Williston, North Dakota, Tatonka Capital Corp. of Denver, Colorado and Integra Bank of Evansville, Indiana. They claim he owes them a combined $48 million.

Claims by each petitioner:

· American Bank $27.1 million
· Tatonka $6.2 million
· First National Bank $14.2 million
· Integra $895,000

In an unrelated Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition, a number of Pearlman’s downtown properties moved closer toward the auction block.

Continue reading " Fremont Bankruptcy Attorney Discusses Three Banks and a Venture Capital Company Push Music Entrepreneur Lou Pearlman Toward Personal Bankruptcy " »

Posted On: August 6, 2008

San Mateo Bankruptcy Attorney Discusses San Diego Diocese Files for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Protection

San Mateo Bankruptcy Attorney Discusses San Diego Diocese Files for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Protection

Yesterday, the Roman Catholic Diocese of San Diego filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. In its filing, the diocese claimed that it had $60.4 million in liquid assets and $95.7 million in property holdings. The move comes just hours before the first trial related to sex abuse allegations against priests in the diocese was about to begin. The diocese and the plaintiffs had been unable to reach a following two days of negotiations in Los Angeles Superior Court.

Lawyers for the plaintiffs rejected the diocese’s “final and best” settlement offer on Tuesday. An attorney for the diocese said the rejection left the diocese “with no choice.” Meanwhile, attorneys for the plaintiffs called the settlement amount insufficient. They are also accusing the diocese of filing for bankruptcy to keep potentially embarrassing details private.

Continue reading " San Mateo Bankruptcy Attorney Discusses San Diego Diocese Files for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Protection " »